SURVEY:SUMMARY:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] It's not clear.  The correct link is:https://github.com/dbarowy/AutoMan
SURVEY:SUMMARY:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:SUMMARY:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] no_but_available
SURVEY:SUMMARY:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] no
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY_COMMENT[string] none
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] It's not clear.  The correct link is:https://github.com/dbarowy/AutoMan
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLIC_COMMENT[string] As with the last time you folks inspected our software, you appear to be using an old build.  Since April 18, 2014 (nearly 5 months ago), our software has used Scala's SBT for our build system.  Your notes indicate that you tried (and failed) to use the old Makefile-based build system.<br/><br/>If you're having trouble building, why not correspond with us?  This is not commercial software; we are academics with limited resources so our testing is similarly limited.  Most of these issues can probably be ironed out with a brief conversation.<br/><br/>If you're interested in the original version of AutoMan that was the subject of the paper, you can sidestep your build problems.  We distribute a binary JAR here, which is the link that you used: http://plasma.cs.umass.edu/emery/automan
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] no_but_available
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] no