SURVEY:SUMMARY:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable SURVEY:SUMMARY:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical SURVEY:SUMMARY:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] The link in the email was correct: http://www.dsc.ufcg.edu.br/~spg/saferefactor/download.htm But in this abstract paper, it does not mentioned that we used the command line version. Our full TSE mentioned in this abstract contains this information. The downloaded version in the survey was the plugin one, which does not have all features needed in the experiment. But it is possible to download the command line version (current release) of the tool in this link. It is also available here: https://bitbucket.org/gustavoasoares/saferefactor/ Another tool mentioned in the paper that is used in the experiment is the JDolly tool. It is available here: https://bitbucket.org/gustavoasoares/jdolly/ And it is documentation: https://bitbucket.org/gustavoasoares/jdolly/wiki/Home SURVEY:SUMMARY:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes SURVEY:SUMMARY:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] yes SURVEY:SUMMARY:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] no SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_COMMENT[string] SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY_COMMENT[string] none SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION_COMMENT[string] SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] The link in the email was correct: http://www.dsc.ufcg.edu.br/~spg/saferefactor/download.htm But in this abstract paper, it does not mentioned that we used the command line version. Our full TSE mentioned in this abstract contains this information. The downloaded version in the survey was the plugin one, which does not have all features needed in the experiment. But it is possible to download the command line version (current release) of the tool in this link. It is also available here: https://bitbucket.org/gustavoasoares/saferefactor/ Another tool mentioned in the paper that is used in the experiment is the JDolly tool. It is available here: https://bitbucket.org/gustavoasoares/jdolly/ And it is documentation: https://bitbucket.org/gustavoasoares/jdolly/wiki/Home SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLIC_COMMENT[string] SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] yes SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION_COMMENT[string] SURVEY:AUTHOR1:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] no