SURVEY:SUMMARY:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] I have only received a generic email asking for the code (no mentioning of reproducibility). When I asked what for, there was no sensible answer so I discarded the request as spam. It is only after receiving an email today (again) from Collbert that I finally understood the likely purpose of this original email. In the mean time, I was wondering why a reproducibility site said that we did not want to have our system tested for reproducibility..Overall this reproducibility effort has good intentions though the execution could be improved.
SURVEY:SUMMARY:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:SUMMARY:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] no_but_available
SURVEY:SUMMARY:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] no
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY_COMMENT[string] none
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] I have only received a generic email asking for the code (no mentioning of reproducibility). When I asked what for, there was no sensible answer so I discarded the request as spam. It is only after receiving an email today (again) from Collbert that I finally understood the likely purpose of this original email. In the mean time, I was wondering why a reproducibility site said that we did not want to have our system tested for reproducibility..Overall this reproducibility effort has good intentions though the execution could be improved.
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLIC_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] no_but_available
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION_COMMENT[string] Our system has been work in progress for a while now, we continuously improved it, though it is not ready to make it available out there.
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] no